|
|
European
Monetary Union
The Case for
Greece
Discussions of economic and monetary union in Europe have highlighted
the need to identify cross-country symmetries and asymmetries in
business cycle fluctuations. If countries' responses to shocks are
similar and synchronous, common policies implemented by Community
institutions will be appropriate, but asymmetric policies will be
required to cope with cycles that differ in intensity, duration and
timing. In Discussion Paper No. 809, Research Fellows Nicos
Christodoulakis and Tryphon Kollintzas, with Sophia
Dimelis, consider the case of Greece, whose economy is often thought
so different from those of its EC partners that it cannot or should not
join a European monetary union.
They use the KydlandPrescott real business cycle approach to study the
fluctuations and co-movements of Greece's key macroeconomic variables
and compare them with those of other EC members. Since the statistical
properties of the detrended components remain controversial, they
examine the sensitivity of their findings to the detrending methodology.
They find that business cycle propagation mechanisms are fairly similar
for Greece and other EC countries, notwithstanding significant
differences in their patterns of fiscal and monetary policies and terms
of trade; economic integration that includes Greece under a set of
common institutions and policies should not pose a problem.
Christodoulakis, Dimelis and Kollintzas then compute contemporaneous
cross-correlations for all main economic variables across the Community,
which provide further support for the similarity of business cycle
propagation mechanisms. The behaviour patterns of variables that are not
directly controlled by government (consumption, inventories, net exports
and prices) are very similar, while those directly controlled by
institutions (public spending and money supply) behave very differently.
This should mitigate the concern that common institutional arrangements
and policies will exacerbate business cycles in face of asymmetric
shocks. Such observed differences in shocks and business cycle
mechanisms should rather tend to disappear as common European
institutions and policies emerge.
Comparisons of Business Cycles in Greece and the EC: Idiosyncrasies
and Regularities
Nicos Christodoulakis, Sophia P Dimelis and Tryphon Kollintzas
Discussion Paper No. 809, July 1993 (IM)
|
|