|
|
European
Single Market
Two-stage
integration
The EC single-market programme will cause non-member
suppliers' relative position to deteriorate as EC firms gain in
competitiveness, although this may be mitigated for EFTA countries by
their participation in the European Economic Area (EEA). The single
market is usually modelled in two steps: a simple reduction in trade
costs; and `full integration', which also affects the competitive
climate and firms' behaviour. In Discussion Paper No. 828, Research
Fellow Jan Haaland notes the consensus that this second stage is
essential for EC member countries to experience significant gains, while
the EFTA countries gain relatively more from the first. He applies a
general equilibrium model to analyse both forms of integration for the
EC and for the entire EEA and also an intermediate case: full
integration within the EC with only a reduction in trade costs between
the EC and EFTA. EFTA also gains substantially in this case but could
reap significant additional gains from full integration.
It is widely expected that the single market's greatest effects will be
in sectors in which scale economies, product differentiation and
imperfect competition feature prominently, and Haaland's results confirm
substantial growth in skill-intensive engineering in both the EC and
EFTA. The reduction of trade costs will clearly raise the level of
trade, but full integration should also eliminate trade based on
imperfect competition (or `reciprocal dumping'), so its overall effect
may be positive or negative. His results indicate
<MI>some<D> growth in intra-EC trade, but the main feature
is the fall in home market prices and the rise in home sales as domestic
firms lose their monopoly positions. There is also evidence of trade
diversion, but this reflects EC firms' increased competitiveness rather
than protection; while the overall welfare effects on the US and Japan
will be small, there may be serious consequences for some industries.
Finally, some very stylized simulations of possible outcomes of the
Uruguay Round indicate that a successful outcome will more than offset
any possible trade diversion arising from European integration.
Welfare Effects of `1992': A General Equilibrium Assessment for EC
and EFTA Countries
Jan I Haaland
Discussion Paper No. 828, July 1993 (IT)
|
|