|
|
EC
Enlargement
Agriculture policy
EC enlargement will entail controversy over agriculture: all European
countries have interventionist policies, but the EFTA countries now
provide substantially more support than the EC(12), while even the most
advanced of the Central and East European economies provide
substantially less. In Discussion Paper No. 829, Research Fellow Kym
Anderson and Rod Tyers consider different groups' welfare in
two cases. First, the EC(12) fully implement in the mid-1990s the CAP
reforms announced in mid-1992; the EFTA countries then join the
Community and reduce their agricultural protection to EC levels. Second,
this enlarged EC allows the Czech and Slovak Republics, Hungary and
Poland free access to its agricultural markets while again keeping CAP
prices unchanged.
Anderson and Tyers draw on their multi-commodity dynamic model of world
food markets, with 1990 prices and base data, to simulate both cases to
the year 2000. In the first, EFTA's consumers and taxpayers gain more
than its farmers lose, and its net welfare gain is $9 billion per year,
while the EC(12) gain some $2 billion. In the second, Central Europe's
farmers benefit far more than its consumers, and the overall welfare
gain is some $37 billion per year, but this assumes that West European
taxpayers cover the full costs of price support and disposal of the
additional export surplus some $47 billion per year. Such trade would in
effect be `tied aid', conditional on Central Europe's deliberate
distortion of its food markets.
Finally, Anderson and Tyers consider how increased pressures for closer
economic integration in Europe may affect protection levels. Enlargement
to EFTA may tend to raise CAP prices, but renewed pressure from the
Central European countries to reduce protection is likely if their bids
for EC membership are effectively ignored until well into the next
century. Even though granting their farmers limited preferential access
would be more wasteful than direct aid, the EC(12) may well continue
with this policy to reduce the risk that their demands will add to
existing pressures from the US and the Cairns Group.
International Trade Implications of EC Expansion for European
Agricultural Policies, Trade and Welfare
Kym Anderson and Rod Tyers
Discussion Paper No. 829, June 1993 (IT)
|
|