|
|
International
Trade
Green growth
Current concerns that domestic environmental protection policies will
reduce certain industries' competitiveness are inducing demands in rich
countries for trade policies to influence environmental policies
elsewhere. In Discussion Paper No. 830, Research Fellow Kym Anderson
argues that such measures will unnecessarily reduce conventionally
measured global economic welfare and may even damage the global
environment. Concern for the environment also provides excuses to raise
trade barriers, which risks a trade war that could undermine global
prosperity. The common claim that trade liberalization that raises
global income will thereby harm the environment also ignores the
reduction in population growth and rise in demand for stricter
environmental standards that typically follow; similar concerns about
relocation of production and consumption focus only on its most direct
effects.
Anderson then considers the liberalization of two of the world's most
distorted commodity markets. Coal and food are both typically overpriced
in industrial and underpriced in poor countries. Taxing rich countries'
coal consumption is reasonable, since it is pollutive, but protection
reduces the world price and encourages its use elsewhere; liberalization
may therefore improve the environment and also raise economic welfare.
Liberalizing food trade raises objections that higher world prices will
lead to further deforestation and more intensive use of chemical
fertilizers and pesticides in the tropics, but global models indicate
that most output expansion will occur on land already cleared in
countries such as Argentina and Australia, which currently make much
less use of such pollutants than Western Europe. Increasing farm output
in Central and Eastern Europe may also benefit the environment by
diverting labour and capital from alternative uses in smokestack
industries. Anderson acknowledges in conclusion that trade
liberalization could damage the environment in some cases, but trade
policy cannot provide a solution: the global trading system underpins
the future prosperity of the next generation and hence also its concern
for the natural environment.
Economic Growth, Environmental Issues and Trade
Kym Anderson
Discussion Paper No. 830, September 1993 (IT)
|
|