|
|
Regional
Integration
Inter-war
lessons
The 1930s witnessed an astonishing implosion of
international trade and a dramatic shift in its direction and pattern as
regional and colonial blocs supplanted the established network of
multilateral settlements. In Discussion Paper No. 837, Research Fellow Barry
Eichengreen and Douglas Irwin provide new evidence indicating
that the effects of the discriminatory trade policies and international
monetary arrangements of this period were neither uniformly favourable
nor unfavourable. The balance of their trade-creating and -diverting
effects depended rather on policy-makers' motivations and the policies'
structure.
For example, British Commonwealth preference reduced trade barriers and
encouraged financial links among member countries without hampering
their trade and payments with non-members. The German-dominated Central
European bloc, in contrast, raised significant barriers to trade and
financial relations with the rest of the world. Nor is there any uniform
ranking of the relative importance of trade and financial policies.
While Commonwealth trade preferences appear to have affected the trade
pattern more strongly than the monetary arrangements of the sterling
area, the exchange controls and clearing arrangements pursued by Germany
and the East European countries in its sphere of influence effectively
dominated their commercial policies' impact on trade.
Eichengreen and Irwin also find evidence supporting Nurkse's conjecture
that exchange rate variability depressed trade volumes in the 1930s.
This runs against the common view that abandoning the gold standard
underpinned recovery and hence the revival of trade. They conclude with
lessons for the emerging regional trade agreements and currency areas of
today: bilateral and regional initiatives to increase trade and monetary
integration can benefit participating countries without harming the rest
of the world, but they can also have a corrosive impact on the
multilateral system. The regional or global character of initiatives
appears to be less important than the structure and design of the
underlying policies.
Trade Blocs, Currency Blocs and the Disintegration of World Trade in
the 1930s
Barry Eichengreen and Douglas A Irwin
Discussion Paper No. 837, September 1993 (IM)
|
|