|
|
Trade
Liberalization
A case for
protectionism
Despite widespread
agreement that trade liberalization is beneficial, the speed of reform
remains a controversial issue. In Discussion Paper No. 856, Research
Fellow Larry Karp and Thierry Paul extend previous work
which found that adjustment costs entailed as labour moves between
sectors cannot justify gradualism and any case for policy intervention
must be based on market failure. For an economy in initial
disequilibrium, workers balance the discounted stream of the future wage
differentials against current adjustment costs. Temporary congestion
costs increase with the migration rate: if migration occurs too quickly,
the first-best policy intervention is a labour tax/subsidy, but trade
policies are often viewed as second-best alternatives. A tariff to
protect the `dying' sector will raise its wage and slow migration at the
cost of distorting both consumption and production.
Karp and Paul first assume that workers have rational expectations and
that the government can commit over an infinite horizon to show that its
optimal policy is to phase in and then phase out protectionism. If its
`period of commitment' is finite, however, the optimal policy as this
period approaches zero is immediate and complete liberalization. It is
therefore optimal at least to <MI>begin<D> reform with
liberalization under both extreme assumptions, which weakens the
gradualist argument for continued protection.
Karp and Paul then relax the assumption that current wages have no
first-order effect on the migration decision, to show that a positive
initial tariff is then the optimal policy even if the government cannot
commit to future policy. They emphasize that these contrasting results
demonstrate the sensitivity of policy prescriptions to the nature of the
migration decision and call for empirical work to determine whether this
is affected by purely transitory variables, such as the current wage
differential and, if so, whether their effects are of the same order of
magnitude as those that proxy future streams of benefits from migration.
Phasing in and Phasing out Protectionism with Costly Adjustment of
Labour
Larry Karp and Thierry Paul
Discussion Paper No. 856, November 1993 (IT)
|
|