|
Much of the economic debate around transition policies in Eastern
Europe centres around the speed and sequencing of reforms. In Discussion
Paper No. 860, Research Fellows Mathias Dewatripont and Gérard
Roland argue that gradualist reform packages are generally easier to
design than those based on the `big bang' approach ex ante and can
therefore start sooner. Their careful sequencing may also build
constituencies for further reform and reduce their reversibility ex
post. They develop a model of transition in which the government chooses
the speed and sequencing of reforms. Since these involve large aggregate
and individual uncertainty, a negative aggregate outcome will induce
pressures for their reversal; while the high reversal costs of a `big
bang' may be advantageous once reform is under way, they may also make
such an approach politically infeasible ex ante. Gradualism enables
reforms to start more easily by providing the additional option of early
reversal at lower cost, after a partial resolution of uncertainty. |