|
|
Inflation
Policy
Fiscal reform comes
first
Recent inflationary experience in countries like
Israel, Argentina and Brazil cannot be explained using conventional
arguments concerning the relation between macroeconomic policy and
inflation. Keynesian theory cannot explain the peculiar 'plateau' path
taken by inflation in those countries: inflation is often stable for
several years, suddenly jumps to a new plateau, stays there for some
years, and then jumps again. Simple monetarist explanations are
unsatisfactory as well, with no apparent link between increases in
inflation and prior or simultaneous increases in the money supply. A
final puzzle concerns the unhappy experiences of some Latin American
countries in the late 1970s and of Israel in 1982-83. They attempted to
stabilize inflation by freezing or restraining exchange-rate movements.
Not only did experiments along these lines end in failure, but after the
collapse of the experiment all these countries saw inflation accelerate
to levels well above those observed before the stabilization programme
started.
In Discussion Paper No. 87, Research Fellow Sweder van Wijnbergen
suggests an explanation for these phenomena which draws upon the 'public
finance approach' to inflation first introduced by Phelps. This approach
does not rely on assumptions of irrational behaviour, arbitrary
expectation mechanisms, or unexplained 'inertia' in the system. Van
Wijnbergen uses a simple open- economy model in which consumers base
intertemporal expenditure plans and asset-market demands on rational
optimizing behaviour. They have perfect foresight and take full account
of their own budget constraint as well as that faced by the public
sector.
Van Wijnbergen uses this model to investigate the response of the
economy to various policy-induced and external shocks under a floating
exchange rate regime. He analyses the transition to a fixed exchange
rate regime and discusses its sustainability. In particular, he explores
the behaviour of the economy when inconsistent policy measures are
adopted and the fixed regime is therefore unsustainable.
Under a floating exchange rate regime, higher world real interest rates
will bring about an increase in inflation in the presence of externally
held government debt. Van Wijnbergen notes that this may illuminate the
experience of Brazil between 1981 and 1985. In addition, van Wijnbergen
shows how restrictive monetary policies, if they are inconsistent with
the government's intertemporal budget constraint, will actually lead to
a depreciation and permanently higher inflation. This result is similar
to the earlier analysis of a closed economy by Sargent and Wallace.
Van Wijnbergen's main results, however, concern the policy of freezing
the exchange rate. He studies the conditions under which a fixed
exchange rate regime will collapse and shows that inflation after the
collapse will exceed the rate just before the start of the stabilization
experiment: a botched stabilization is worse than none at all.
He also shows that during a freeze, restricting domestic credit growth
to a rate that will prevent reserve outflows is insufficient to prevent
speculative attacks on the fixed exchange rate. If the public sector
follows such a credit policy, financing the remainder of its deficit by
issuing public debt, the post-collapse rate of inflation will be even
higher than that which would result from financing the deficit through
credit creation alone.
Van Wijnbergen's analysis assumes that the government does not undertake
the reforms in government expenditure and taxation necessary to make the
fixed exchange rate regime feasible. He stresses that even if the
government intends to undertake such reforms in the future, speculative
disruption of its policies will occur if the private sector doubts that
these reforms will in fact be implemented. The policy conclusion is
clear, according to van Wijnbergen: credible fiscal reform is not only
necessary for the success of anti-inflation programmes, but should take
precedence.
Fiscal Deficits, Exchange Rate Crises
and Inflation
Sweder van Wijnbergen
Discussion Paper No. 87, December 1985 (IT)
|
|