|
That East European governments have made only slow progress in
dealing with the large loss-making state-owned enterprises (SOEs)
inherited from socialism should come as no surprise to those familiar
with recent UK and Mexican experience of implementing enterprise reform
on a much smaller scale. In Discussion Paper No. 898, Research Fellow Sweder
van Wijnbergen argues that gradualism offers no solution, since
governments in the region would probably be no better able to deal with
loss-making SOEs slowly. The extreme laissez-faire alternative of
wholesale bankruptcy proceedings would also be unnecessarily
destructive: for economies in transition, enterprises' past and current
losses may reflect distorted incentives rather than bad management or
outright insolvency; the capacity of the law-courts is very limited; and
bankruptcy codes exhibit a strong bias towards liquidation rather than
restructuring. He proposes instead that an SOE's major private creditor
should take the lead in initiating its restructuring and designing a
new, viable capital structure, since lead banks are better placed than
governments to assess firms' long-term viability. |
|