|
|
European
Monetary Union
Optimum banking
Alesina and Grilli have applied the Rogoff framework concerning the
appointment of a central banker more conservative than the median voter
to argue that the diversity of individual EU countries' objectives may
undermine prospects for European monetary union. In Discussion Paper No.
903, Research Fellow Paul Levine and Joseph Pearlman
extend this work to develop a multi-period model of a European Central
Bank (ECB) that is unable to precommit which also exhibits the nominal
and real wage rigidities that characterize most European labour markets.
For multi-period wage contracts, money is no longer neutral, so even
anticipated inflation can have real effects.
Levine and Pearlman show that the optimum central banker is still more
conservative than the median voter, and the central banker's
conservatism increases with the output target (relative to the variance
of each shock), wage stickiness and the conservatism of the median
voter. They assess the feasibility of a monetary union, for countries
whose median voters' preferences differ, by examining their welfare
losses when inside and outside the union relative to the bench-mark of
each country's first-best outcome of establishing its own independent
central bank with a degree of conservatism appropriate to its own labour
market.
Levine and Pearlman find that the existence of nominal and real wage
rigidities may improve the prospects for such a union with an
independent central bank outside the control of any one government,
provided labour market divergences are not too great. Multi-period
contracts then allow anticipated monetary policy to enhance welfare,
although these benefits will not be realized unless the central bankers
are able to precommit or their conservatism increases with wage
rigidity. Substantial remaining differences across EU countries' labour
markets concerning wage rigidities imply, however, that whether or not
the ECB can achieve a degree of conservatism that benefits all members
of a prospective monetary union remains an open question.
Labour Market Structure, Conservative Bankers and the Feasibility
of Monetary Union
Paul Levine and Joseph Pearlman
Discussion Paper No. 903, February 1994 (IM)
|
|