|
The Nordic countries, Chile, Israel and Mexico have recently adopted
unilateral exchange rate bands, and many LDCs and former socialist
economies may do likewise. Such a commitment requires important choices
about the band width, the frequency and form of realignments, the method
of intervention and the central parity, but the recent voluminous
literature on currency bands has largely taken their existence and width
as exogenous and cannot account for policy changes such as the widening
of bands in the ERM. In Discussion Paper No. 907, Alex Cukierman,
Miguel Kiguel and Research Fellow Leonardo Leiderman
develop a model of such bands as outcomes of an optimization problem for
policy-makers who weigh the level of the real exchange rate against the
level and variability of the nominal rate. For countries concerned to
preserve and improve their competitiveness and current accounts while
avoiding the inflationary consequences of a nominal depreciation, such
bands provide a simple, verifiable means of making a credible commitment
while retaining enough flexibility to shield exports and the current
account from adverse shocks. By endogenizing decisions about the band
width and realignments, this framework allows the authors to identify
the conditions under which reneging on the commitment and setting a new
set of band parameters is the optimal response to shocks. |