|
|
Employment
Patterns
UK evidence
Labour economists have long studied net changes in employment but
have only recently turned their attention to gross levels of job
creation and destruction, which are also of interest for analysis of the
business cycle and industrial organization. In Discussion Paper No. 912,
David Blanchflower and Simon Burgess relate recent
theoretical models of these processes to UK data on private and public
sector manufacturing and services establishments during 1980-90. They
find that many common beliefs about job creation and destruction and
employment growth rates are false or misleading.
Blanchflower and Burgess find that the dispersion of employment growth
rates was greater in manufacturing than in services. Less than half of
jobs created (destroyed) arose in plants growing (declining) at more
than 20% per annum. About half of all job creation and destruction were
concentrated in just 4% of plants. Manufacturing accounted for around
one-third of total job creation (roughly its share in total employment).
Many manufacturing plants prospered during the 1980 recession, with 25%
of survivors growing by 5% or more. Jobs were created and destroyed in
groups of roughly equal size. Employment was only marginally more stable
in large plants than small ones. Job turnover among plants 25 years old
or more was far from negligible, at 9% in 1980 and 15.5% in 1984.
Blanchflower and Burgess maintain that neither conventional labour
demand nor simple sector sectoral flows models can properly account for
the diversity and concentration of employment growth rates, and
selection and passive learning models account for only a small part of
turnover. Dropping their common assumption of perfect competition may
identify winners and losers, however, and the persistence of their
success (or otherwise) will then depend on such models' structure.
Models of the introduction and diffusion of innovations may account for
the concentrations of employment gains and losses, while the channel
through which aggregate macroeconomic shocks also affect the
distribution of employment growth may shed light on the modelling of
such aggregate labour market phenomena as unemployment.
Job Creation and Job Destruction in Britain: 1980-90
David G Blanchflower and Simon M Burgess
Discussion Paper No. 912, February 1994 (HR)
|
|