|
The boards of listed companies or privatizing governments seeking to
maximize profits from sales of their assets may choose from a variety of
methods. In Discussion Paper No. 924, Jeremy Bulow and Research
Fellow Paul Klemperer explicitly model three options: engaging in
negotiations for the best possible price in a private sale to `raiders'
that have expressed interest; holding an open auction among them and
other bidders that then emerge; and conducting negotiations while also
retaining the right to hold a subsequent auction if no sale is agreed. A
skilled negotiator may secure a higher price by credibly threatening not
to sell if the offers are too low or by making an offer to one buyer on
the basis of information learned from the others. Proceeding directly to
an auction is likely to maximize participation in bidding, since it
increases both publicity and the expected surplus per bidder, but it
also reduces the negotiating power of the seller, who must now simply
accept the highest bid. Keeping the options open reduces the cost of
negotiations that fail but it also reduces their effectiveness, since
buyers know there will be another opportunity to purchase the company. |