|
|
Exchange
Rates
A Holy Trinity?
The widespread belief among economists that the components of
Mundell's `Holy Trinity' fixed exchange rates, independent monetary
policies and perfect capital mobility are mutually incompatible was
illustrated most recently by the effective collapse of the ERM just a
few years after the final barriers to capital mobility were removed. In
Discussion Paper No. 929, Research Fellow Andrew Rose attempts to
quantify the trade-offs between exchange rate stability, monetary
divergence and capital mobility for a panel of monthly data for 22
countries during 1967-92, which cover widely varying exchange rate
regimes, capital market regulations and macroeconomic policies.
Rose finds that monetary divergence and increased capital mobility are
usually associated with increased exchange rate turbulence, but the
relationships are statistically weak and there is surprisingly little
evidence of a trade-off among the three components. These results may be
explained, however, by the symmetrical treatment of long periods of
tranquillity and shorter periods of crisis. Many accounts of the 1992-3
ERM crises have neglected the extended period of stable exchange rates,
increased monetary divergence and high capital mobility that preceded
the speculative attacks.
Rose also finds a highly significant positive link between the width of
the official exchange rate band and conditional exchange rate
volatility, so stated exchange rate policy has a significant effect on
exchange rate volatility above and beyond the effects of actual
macroeconomic policy. Despite the difficulties of measuring monetary
independence and capital mobility, these results cast doubt on the
effectiveness of recent proposals for wide (and loose) real exchange
rate bands to reduce volatility (and misalignments). The proposed
reintroduction of capital controls may do little to reduce exchange rate
volatility, which the 1993 widening of the ERM bands may even increase.
Divergence of monetary policy and the extent of capital mobility appear
neither necessary nor sufficient for an exchange rate regime to
collapse; macroeconomic convergence therefore need not deter exchange
rate instability.
Exchange Rate Volatility, Monetary Policy, and Capital Mobility:
Empirical Evidence on the Holy Trinity
Andrew K Rose
Discussion Paper No. 929, March 1994 (IM)
|
|