|
|
Location
Choice
Civic geography
A combination of
private and public facilities determines the geography of modern cities.
Large private firms both influence consumers' residential choices and
anticipate the effects of their own locational choices on the
residential pattern, while the locations of many public facilities
affect the locational choices of households and firms alike. When there
are small numbers of large firms, their strategic interactions become
critical and may themselves be affected by the presence of public
facilities or other particular geographical features. In Discussion
Paper No. 933, Research Fellow Jacques-François Thisse and David
Wildasin develop a simple model of a single public facility (whose
location is given) and duopolistic private firms to identify the optimal
and equilibrium spatial configurations of firms and households. They
find that equilibrium outcomes are often sub-optimal even if there are
no congestion or other technological or consumption externalities.
Thisse and Wildasin show that strategic externalities arising between
firms may cause them to be excessively or insufficiently dispersed,
depending on the precise configuration of critical parameters including
the cost of transport, but a combination of taxes on and subsidies to
transport may remove this market failure and support an efficient
locational pattern. These results differ significantly from those
identified in conventional transport economics, which typically ignore
strategic considerations. The authors' comparative statics analysis
reveals that the fall in the optimal tax precisely matches the rise in
the real transport cost per unit of distance, so the total cost of
transport will therefore remain constant in the face of technological
change. Any real reductions in its cost will therefore affect neither
the urban structure nor consumers' travel patterns. Improved transport
facilities may nevertheless yield benefits in the form of higher
consumption and profits, as a fall in the real cost of travel allows the
redistribution to consumers of the taxes required to preserve the
optimal spatial figuration.
Optimal Transportation Policy with Strategic Locational Choice
Jacques-François Thisse and David E Wildasin
Discussion Paper No. 933, April 1994 (IO)
|
|