|
|
Labour
Markets
Multiple applications
Many models of wage
bargaining between a firm and a job applicant neglect the cases where
there are several suitable applicants or job offers. In Discussion Paper
No. 938, Melvyn Coles and Abhinay Muthoo develop a
microeconomic model of job matching in which firms advertise vacancies
in local newspapers or post them in job centres. Reservation prices are
determined endogenously and the negotiated wage depends explicitly on
whether either party holds such outside options. Workers' reservation
wages fall as the number of competing job seekers increases but rise
with the arrival rate of new vacancies. The reservation wage of a firm
with an advertised vacancy rises with the number of competing vacancies
but falls with a rise in the flow of workers into unemployment. Wages
are therefore sensitive to labour market conditions and move in the
expected direction but not sufficiently to clear the market.
If a firm advertising a vacancy is `lucky', a suitable job seeker in the
unemployment pool will apply for the job; if it is `very lucky', there
will be several applicants and it can negotiate the reservation wage of
one of them. If the firm is `unlucky', however, the vacancy may be left
on the books of the job centre or readvertised, in the hope that a new
entrant to the unemployment pool will be suitable. Similarly, newly
unemployed workers will always face a stock of vacancies and will
re-enter employment immediately if one (or more) is suitable but must
wait for new vacancies to be advertised when none is available. Coles
and Muthoo demonstrate unambiguously that `new' vacancies (or newly
unemployed workers) fare better than those that have already sampled the
market and found no suitable workers (or jobs). There are also
increasing returns to matching: as the arrival rates of new unemployed
workers and vacancies increase, all agents can expect to become better
off.
Strategic Bargaining and Competitive Bidding in a Dynamic Market
Equilibrium
Melvyn G Coles and Abhinay Muthoo
Discussion Paper No. 938, April 1994 (HR)
|
|