|
|
Labour
Economics
Lags and rigidities
Economists have long puzzled over why prices often remain rigid in
the face of changes in demand, since substantial fluctuations in output
and employment are then required to clear product markets instead. In
Discussion Paper No. 959, Assar Lindbeck and Programme Director Dennis
Snower develop a model in which such price inertia arises out of
lags in the production process. Final goods sold to consumers are
typically made from intermediate goods purchased from other producers,
who may in turn have purchased inputs from yet other producers and so on
all the way back to the raw materials. Production also takes time, so
the intermediate goods used by a producer of final goods at any
particular time will have originated at various points in the past. Such
producers therefore precommit to their selling prices without knowing
with any accuracy how the prices of the goods they purchase or the wages
they pay their workers will reflect demand conditions when they finally
sell their own output. If they systematically underestimate the strength
of changes in demand conditions, they will change prices by less than
they should, and the resulting price rigidity implies that quantities
must bear the burden of adjustment. Lindbeck and Snower argue that fully
anticipated demand changes are virtually inconceivable when final output
prices depend on intermediate input prices which depend in turn on
nominal wages and hence in turn on final goods prices and they apply
this framework to demonstrate that temporary changes to aggregate demand
may induce persistent effects on prices (and quantities). These effects
may be magnified further if nominal wages are also rigid.
In Discussion Paper No. 960, Lindbeck and Snower develop an
insider-outsider model in which the existence of labour turnover costs
impedes both outsiders' entry into and insiders' exit from employment.
This increases insiders' market power by raising their chances of
retaining employment relative to outsiders' chances of gaining
employment at any given wage, and the insiders are assumed to pursue
their own interests in the wage negotiation process, from which the
outsiders are to some extent excluded. Lindbeck and Snower use this
model to account for three stylized facts about labour markets: first,
all unemployment rates exhibit persistence, which is greater in Europe
than in the US; second, the average unemployment rate was higher in the
US than in Europe throughout the 1950s and 1960s, but the opposite has
applied in the 1980s; and third, the long-run unemployment rate has
remained within a narrow range of 2-8% in the long run.
Lindbeck and Snower argue that excluding outsiders from wage setting
reduces overall labour demand, while turnover costs also reduce labour
markets' speed of adjustment, although some hiring and firing
nevertheless takes place, so hysteresis is not complete. Greater
persistence in Europe relative to the US reflects the facts that
employment protection legislation is more widespread, that most European
countries have more homogeneous labour forces so that workers are less
likely to quit, and that their labour forces have displayed slower
growth. The trend rise of unemployment in Europe relative to the US
mainly reflects the role of persistence, as the after-effects of the
recessions of the 1970s and 1980s have been more strongly felt in
Europe. The long-run stability of the unemployment rate, despite its
inverse short-run relationship with productivity and massive rises in
both productivity and the overall size of the labour force over the
longer run, is compatible with an insider-outsider model in which
wage-setting depends only on hiring rates and not on the size of the
labour force or productivity. Lindbeck and Snower note in conclusion
that various models of non-clearing labour markets may account for some
of these stylized facts, but only the insider-outsider model is
consistent with all of them.
Price Inertia and Production Lags
Patterns of Unemployment: An Insider-Outsider Analysis
Assar Lindbeck and Dennis J Snower
Discussion Papers Nos. 959-60, July 1994 (HR)
|
|