|
While standard
neoclassical models of growth simply assume that aggregate output and
output per worker grow at a constant rate and the more recent
theoretical literature on `endogenous growth' considers the conditions
under which growth rates may rise over time, the corresponding empirical
evidence has been mixed. In Discussion Paper No. 965, Research Affiliate
Dan Ben-David and David Papell apply recent developments
in time-series analysis to investigate whether output grows at a
constant rate over extended periods. of time. They use aggregate and per
capita data on the annual output of 16 countries over up to 130 years to
conduct two tests of the unit root hypothesis. The first allows no break
in the trend, and its results indicate that the unit root hypothesis
cannot be rejected but provide little evidence of constant growth since
1860. The second allows for a break in each country's trend function,
associated with a sharp fall in GDP in most cases, and this modification
enables the unit root hypothesis to be rejected for both aggregate and
per capita real GDP in most cases. Ben-David and Papell then calculate
the steady-state growth rates in each sub-period, which reveal that
post-break growth rates were twice the pre-break rates on average for
aggregate GDP and two-and-a-half times the pre-break rates for per
capita GDP. |