|
There is widespread agreement that price deregulation promotes
competition and should therefore be favoured in most industries. Over
the past decade, governments in the US and EU member states have largely
relinquished their powers to enforce `mill pricing' to prohibit firms
from discriminating on price between spatially separated consumers.
Firms' ability to cut prices in one part of the market without changing
prices elsewhere effectively reduces their power to commit to any set of
prices which strengthens price competition. In Discussion Paper No. 972,
George Norman and Jacques-François Thisse argue that
fiercer price competition need not benefit consumers, however: for a
given degree of product variety, stronger price competition will reduce
the prices charged by incumbent firms, but it may also benefit these
firms by deterring entry. Norman and Thisse show that the latter effect
dominates: discriminatory pricing reduces product variety relative to
mill pricing. |
|