|
|
Eastern
Europe
Reform in Hungary
At a lunchtime meeting on 1 March, István Székely discussed
the current state of the reform process in Hungary. Székely is Economic
Affairs Officer at the United Nations Department of Economic and Social
Development and a Research Associate in CEPR's programme on Economic
Transformation in Eastern Europe. His remarks drew on his current
research and on the conference volume, Hungary: An Economy in Transition
(see box). Financial support for the conference from the ACE programme
of the Commission of the European Communities, Citibank and the Foreign
and Commonwealth Office and for this meeting from Cambridge University
Press is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed by Dr Székely
were his own, however, not those of these institutions nor of CEPR,
which takes no institutional policy positions.
Székely stated that economic activity in Hungary had stagnated at the
end of 1991 and bottomed out during 1992, so annual data continue to
show a decline, but there are now signs of recovery. In 1992, export
volumes increased for the first time since the beginning of economic
transformation, mainly due to further sizeable increases in exports to
OECD and EC markets. Hungary is now over the worst of the collapse of
its trade with Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, while being
able to maintain a positive current account balance since 1990. The
latter enabled Hungary to attain a comfortably high level of
international reserves and to reduce its net foreign debt significantly.
Székely stressed that the state budget deficit remains high: if
financed through the capital market, this will crowd out private
investment essential to the transformation's long-term success, while
issuing money instead would bring back high inflation. The budget
deficit is less important in itself than as an indicator of the
postponement of necessary reforms, which will be painful regardless of
who carries them out and when. The administration had successfully
brought inflation under control, but the current domestic real interest
rates on corporate loans of over 15% pose a major threat to recovery.
Even firms that could expand export activity cannot afford to borrow the
funds they require. Over one-quarter of all exports are to Germany, so
producers must prepare for a harsher export climate in the short run.
Turning to longer-term prospects, Székely maintained that successful
economic development must be based on export-led growth, while the
necessary improvements in the product market structure or in technology
to keep costs low and sales high will depend critically on new
investments. Almost no long-term finance is available to industry, since
the state budget deficit crowds it out and most investors are not yet
ready to hold long-term assets. Foreign direct investment is high
relative to other countries of the region but low relative to investment
needs, and a considerable part has been tied to privatization, so
increasing domestic savings is an urgent priority.
Székely noted that technical assistance from the West will continue,
but no more large-scale aid is expected. A clear commitment by the
European Community to well-defined criteria for Hungary's future
membership would promote growth, not least through the effects of
harmonization of its legal and taxation systems with those of the
Community during the process leading to accession. Unemployment reached
13.3% in January, however, which was well above the European average and
increasing, and many enterprises are now engaged in bankruptcy or
liquidation procedures. The cuts to public spending now required will
have drastic effects on education and health care, which will harm
lower-income groups disproportionately. The extent of social tolerance
for the reforms remains unclear, and Székely concluded that Hungary
faces a difficult process of transition. Hopes remain of future
prosperity, integration into the world economy and convergence between
Eastern and Western Europe, but it is still too early to say whether
these will be fulfilled.
|
|