|
|
Labour
Economics
European
Unemployment
At a CEPR lunchtime meeting on 29 July held to mark the launch of
Mismatch and Labour Mobility, Dennis Snower argued that the
European Commission's proposals in its `Social Charter' could have
severe detrimental effects on the Community's labour markets. Snower is
Professor of Economics at Birkbeck College, London, Co-Director of the
Human Resources programme of the Centre for Economic Policy Research,
and a contributor to the volume. Financial support for the meeting was
provided by the UK Economic and Social Research Council as part of its
support for the Centre's dissemination programme. The views expressed by
Professor Snower were his own, however, not those of any of the above
organizations nor of CEPR, which takes no institutional policy
positions.
Snower noted that the European Commission's `Community Charter of
Fundamental Social Rights of Workers' commonly known as the Social
Charter is intended to avoid the danger that `social dumping' will lead
to a `levelling down' of social protection in the Community. The
Charter's proponents argue that if countries offering relatively low
worker protection and benefits enjoy a competitive advantage,
entrepreneurs will increase investment in such countries hence creating
more firms and jobs at the expense of those offering higher protection.
The unemployed will have an incentive to migrate to countries where they
have the fewest rights; and average levels of job security and social
benefits will fall. The Social Charter is meant instead to raising
social provision throughout the Community to the levels provided by the
more generous countries. Snower argued, however, that the proposed
policy is inappropriate to its stated objectives and can be expected to
hurt precisely those workers and firms that it is intended to help.
Further, it will reduce investment, create mismatch, and raise the
overall level of EC unemployment, particularly in the aftermath of a
world-wide recession.
Snower focused initially on the Charter's effects at the microeconomic
level. First, if the proposed directives become national law in the EC
member states, firms will provide more favourable work conditions to
their current employees particularly those whom it would be too costly
to fire in any case but they will be discouraged from hiring new people.
Hence the Social Charter may be expected to help the the `insiders'
established, incumbent workers at the expense of `outsiders' the
long-term unemployed, school leavers and temporary staff. Second, the
Charter will strengthen the bargaining position of current established
employees, because it will increase the costs of laying them off and
improve their fall-back position if they are laid off. As a result, they
will achieve higher real wages and increased job security. Increased
wages will discourage the firm from hiring new recruits and insiders
will benefit once again while outsiders lose.
Snower argued that the Community's proposed policies will therefore
increase the inequality of income distribution. Over the long term, its
effects will be even more pernicious: as insiders retire while fewer new
entrants are hired, the insider workforce will shrink; and number of the
policy's beneficiaries will fall relative to the number of losers.
Measures to finance the increased provision for social security and
employment protection will further exacerbate these effects.
Implementing the Charter may also create substantial `mismatch'.
Incumbent workers will become less mobile as their jobs become more
attractive with more security and higher wages while their chances of
getting other jobs will be simultaneously reduced. They will therefore
be less likely to move in response to new economic opportunities
resulting from technological progress, swings in consumer tastes or
changes in raw material resources. Firms will also become less
responsive to changes in business conditions, since the worker
protection legislation will increase the costs of starting up new firms
or closing down existing ones.
Snower then turned to the Charter's macroeconomic implications and
argued that its implementation would create unemployment inertia, making
economies less resilient in the aftermath of recessions. Measures of
worker protection and employment security will raise the insiders'
chances of keeping their jobs while reducing the outsiders' chances of
finding them. If this year's employment rate is low say, because of a
world-wide recession so insiders comprise a smaller proportion of the
labour force, next year's employment rate will also tend to be low.
Long-term unemployment will reinforce these effects: as the skills of
unemployed workers deteriorate and become obsolete, over time they will
become discouraged and therefore search less intensively. Even
conservative estimates indicate that a successful implementation of the
directives following from the Social Charter could nearly triple the
time the Community requires to recover from any temporary shortfall in
labour demand.
Snower maintained in conclusion that governments aiming to ensure that
workers are treated well in market economies should take steps to ensure
that their labour is and remains in demand. These may include
supply-side measures to increase the mobility of firms and workers and
provide incentives for employment, investment and the creation of new
firms, so that all citizens of the EC member states can share in the
benefits of a buoyant, integrated labour market. Policies such as
profit-sharing and apprenticeship schemes which make it more difficult
for incumbent workers and firms to insulate themselves from competition
may play a particularly important role. The Commission's efforts in
deregulation, training, the liberalization of government procurement
policies, elimination of exchange controls, harmonization of standards
and the removal of countless further non-tariff barriers should enhance
firms' responsiveness to business opportunities throughout the
Community. This progress in liberalizing Europe's product markets should
be reinforced with deregulation and measures to promote mobility in
labour markets. Once such labour market activity is `levelled up' across
the Community, competitive forces will ensure that social provision
follows suit.
Mismatch and Labour Mobility, Fiorella Padoa Schioppa (ed.), Cambridge
University Press for CEPR, £40.00/$64.50.
|
|