Discussion paper

DP13641 Regulating Cancellation Rights with Consumer Experimentation

Embedding consumer experimentation with a product or service into a market environment, we find that unregulated contracts induce too few returns or cancellations, as they do not internalize a pecuniary externality on other firms in the market. Forcing firms to let consumers learn longer by imposing a commonly observed statutory minimum cancellation or refund period is socially efficient only when firms appropriate much of the market surplus, while it backfires otherwise. Interestingly, cancellation rights are a poor predictor of competition, as in the unregulated outcome firms grant particularly generous rights when competition is neither too low nor too high.

£6.00
Citation

Inderst, R and F Hoffmann (2019), ‘DP13641 Regulating Cancellation Rights with Consumer Experimentation‘, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 13641. CEPR Press, Paris & London. https://cepr.org/publications/dp13641