Discussion paper

DP7928 Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?

We simultaneously assess the contributions to productivity of three sources of research and development spillovers: geographic, technology and product?market proximity. To do this, we construct a new measure of geographic proximity that is based on the distribution of a firm?s inventor locations rather than its headquarters, and we report both parametric and semiparametric estimates of our geographic?distance functions. We find that: i) Geographic space matters even after conditioning on horizontal and technological spillovers; ii) Technological proximity matters; iii) Product?market proximity is less important; iv) Locations of researchers are more important than headquarters but both have explanatory power; and v) Geographic markets are very local.


Van Reenen, J, M Slade, S Lychagin and J Pinkse (eds) (2010), “DP7928 Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?”, CEPR Press Discussion Paper No. 7928. https://cepr.org/publications/dp7928